Teams

TWalker (Carmel)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-15vs LO'Callaghan/Herlong (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMissy Goodrich / Amy Yancey vs Tammy Ward / Lorna O'Callaghan1-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs KBorans/JZarambo (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Yancey vs Kym Armbruster6-0, 6-4
2023-05-01vs DFerguson (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Wendi Brown vs Anita Dowker / Susan McGarry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-24vs BMarks (Providence CC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Michaud / Susan Taylor vs Anna Troppmann / Maggie Webb3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAngie Michaud vs Stacy Andrews6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Susan Taylor vs Lindsey Kerr / Laurie Hoots2-6, 5-7
2023-04-03vs EBrandon (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Yancey / Mary Ruth Faulkner vs Lori van Blarcom / Whitney D'Allaird0-6, 3-6
2023-03-13vs MJones (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesAngie Michaud vs Dana Holloman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Yancey / Jennifer Harrison vs Erin Clapham / Laura Difraia5-7, 4-6
2023-03-06vs MAyers/JZuehlke (Park Crossing)Won 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Yancey vs Anastasia Speer7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLori Anderson / Angie Michaud vs Jocelyn Zuehlke / Mary Lynn Thigpen6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Lauren Mulligan
published
3.34
Amy Yancey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Missy Goodrich
published
3.09
Heidi Friedman
published 3.5
3.08
Wendi Brown
published
3.00
Sheri Sayman
published
2.94
Tamara Wise
published
2.93
Paige Reece
published
Angie Michaud
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Mary Ruth Faulkner
published
Gina Arado
published
Lori Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Yancey + Lauren Mulligan134 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Mulligan + Missy Goodrich404 matchesnot enough data
Paige Reece + Heidi Friedman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mulligan
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Amy Yancey
52W–71L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Missy Goodrich
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Heidi Friedman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
Wendi Brown
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sheri Sayman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Tamara Wise
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.94
Paige Reece
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Angie Michaud
12W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Ruth Faulkner
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.73
Gina Arado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.