Teams

BHSC-Kastendike

2024 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-21vs ACAC-LittleLost 01
L#1 SinglesSilvia Blemker vs Karin Jones0-6, 1-6
2024-10-10vs Sweet Sets-WardLost 02
L#1 SinglesSilvia Blemker vs Maren Ward4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLindy Kastendike vs Michelle Ruiz6-7, 2-6
2024-10-07vs Keswick-MerrickWon 10
W#1 SinglesSilvia Blemker vs Gillian Grant6-1, 6-1
2024-09-30vs Farmington-CowenLost 01
L#2 SinglesLindy Kastendike vs Ashleigh Pivonka1-6, 3-6
2024-09-12vs Sweet Sets-WardLost 01
L#2 SinglesLindy Kastendike vs Maren Ward3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Shannon Henderson
published
3.10
Rachel Swartz
published
2.98
Gwenedd Murray
published
2.92
Lindy Kastendike
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Carleen Kupcis
published 3
2.85
Maritza Johnson
published
2.85
Patricia Irby
published
2.77
Silvia Blemker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carleen Kupcis + Silvia Blemker171352% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Henderson
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Rachel Swartz
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gwenedd Murray
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Lindy Kastendike
72W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Carleen Kupcis
40W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Maritza Johnson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Patricia Irby
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Silvia Blemker
82W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.