Teams

SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Faltico

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Men 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-20vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ VannSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Witt / Michael Faltico vs Jacob Watton / Chakib Bouhdary3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Daniel Marashlian vs Jeffrey Newton / Eric Vann3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-06vs SD 3.5 ECCTA/ RundeLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Faltico / Mike Hasan vs Scott Drew / Benjamin Malonzo1-6, 6-7
2022-10-30vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ KamasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Russell Austin vs David Coria / John Torres6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Scott Trulove vs Brendan Farley / Stephen Kontos1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRandall Bolelli / John Wurster vs Eloka Okonkwo / Omer Buyukkol3-6, 2-6
2022-10-16vs SD LLW 3.5 Mountain View/ VannWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / William Witt vs Chakib Bouhdary / Jacob Watton6-1, 7-5
2022-10-02vs SD 3.5 ECCTA/ RundeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Faltico / Daniel Marashlian vs Tony Almanza / Melvin Pascoguin6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Trulove / Randall Bolelli vs Scott Drew / Arjay Mendoza6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-25vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ KamasWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Faltico / Daniel Marashlian vs John McCauley / Marc Villanueva6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRandall Bolelli / Scott Trulove vs Whitney Benzian / Brendan Farley6-4, 6-4
2022-09-18vs SD 3.5 Tierrasanta TC/ AnnobilLost 02
L#2 DoublesScott Trulove / Michael Faltico vs Justin Cook / Eric Traboulay6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Wurster / Randall Bolelli vs Omer Buyukkol / Koby Blankson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Russell Austin
published
3.52
Jeffrey Russell
published
3.48
Daniel Marashlian
published 3.5
3.48
Michael Faltico
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Randall Bolelli
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Scott Trulove
published
3.07
John Wurster
published
William Witt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Russell Austin
16W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Jeffrey Russell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.52
3.5
Daniel Marashlian
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Michael Faltico
46W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Randall Bolelli
45W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Scott Trulove
6W–14L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
John Wurster
3W–20L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
William Witt
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.