Teams

MPTC - Baseliner

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Monday Men's Singles · 4.0 Men Singles

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-08vs MPTC - Good GuysLost 02
L#2 SinglesDouglas Goodman vs Lee Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJeffrey Yates vs Justin Sinclair0-6, 3-6
2025-12-01vs MPTC - GambitLost 01
L#3 SinglesJosh Bost vs CHRISTIAN MORRISON4-6, 2-6
2025-11-17vs HFTC - Star LordLost 01
L#3 SinglesAustin Jacobs vs Max Burnett3-6, 4-6
2025-11-03vs HFTC - StoreyWon 20
W#1 SinglesLuis Cossio vs Ted Levy6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDouglas Goodman vs Eddy de Los Santos6-1, 6-2
2025-10-27vs MPTC - GambitWon 10
W#3 SinglesDouglas Goodman vs CHRISTIAN MORRISON2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-20vs MPTC - Good GuysLost 03
L#1 SinglesLuis Cossio vs Yasharth Gautam5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAustin Jacobs vs Justin Sinclair2-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesJeffrey Yates vs Shane Daniels6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-13vs HFTC - Star LordWon 10
W#3 SinglesLuis Cossio vs Khoa Dao6-1, 6-1
2025-09-29vs HFTC - StoreyWon 21
W#2 SinglesAustin Jacobs vs Sasan Ziatabar7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDouglas Goodman vs Ted Levy4-6, 2-6
W#4 SinglesJeffrey Yates vs Eric Storey6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Luis Cossio
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Christopher Kim
published 4
3.64
Jeffrey Yates
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.58
Douglas Goodman
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.57
Austin Jacobs
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.46
Andy Luu
published 4
3.41
Josh Bost
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Hector Lopez Auces
published
James Richardson
published
Tony Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Bost + Jeffrey Yates5254% games+0.5% vs expected
Tony Garcia + Douglas Goodman224 matchesnot enough data
Josh Bost + Christopher Kim044 matchesnot enough data
Andy Luu + Josh Bost033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Cossio
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Christopher Kim
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeffrey Yates
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Douglas Goodman
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Austin Jacobs
8W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Andy Luu
16W–26L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Josh Bost
19W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Hector Lopez Auces
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
James Richardson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Garcia
4W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.