Teams

Newk Em

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 Women Monday

17 players · average NTRP 3.93 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-21vs Tough LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Virginia Raborn vs Callie Musselman / Bonnie Chumbley6-4, 6-3
2025-03-03vs JestersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Kristi Schaeper vs Zdenka Edgar / Andrea Turk6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-24vs T Bar M GirlfriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeigha Cochran / Kristi Schaeper vs Suzanna Harrison / Laura Rice6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Aly Gerloff
published 4
3.96
Samantha Kadish
published
3.89
Vicki Contreras
published
3.88
Shannon Riser
published
3.87
Kristi Schaeper
published
3.85
Victoria Nanos
published
3.84
3.81
Leigha Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Denise Tillman
published 4
3.75
Kristine Pak
published
3.68
Michelle Just
published
3.67
Susanna Harrison
published
3.63
Nicole Schulze
published
3.62
Candice Hitt
published 4
3.61
3.21
Isabella Contreras
published 3.5
Virginia Raborn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samantha Kadish + Vicki Contreras6261% games−2.7% vs expected
Vicki Contreras + Leigha Cochran033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aly Gerloff
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Samantha Kadish
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
Vicki Contreras
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Shannon Riser
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Kristi Schaeper
6W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Victoria Nanos
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Elizabeth Snelling
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Leigha Cochran
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Denise Tillman
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Pak
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
Michelle Just
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Susanna Harrison
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Nicole Schulze
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Candice Hitt
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Bonnie Schweinsberg
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Isabella Contreras
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Virginia Raborn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.