Teams

CBRC-Porter

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs YTC-Drop It Like It's ShotWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Porter / Karina Klein vs Martha Marchand / Clover Newman1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoins vs Leslie Stanfield6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarija Velickovic / Kim Pak vs Valerie Hull / Kellye Richelderfer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-21vs EW-PFC-SchnurmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Pak / Karina Klein vs Judy Chessar / Linda Loretz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarija Velickovic vs Kayla Sharp3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Porter / Shirley Qiao vs Anne Schnurman / Sara Hannigan6-1, 6-4
2026-03-21vs YTC-Drop It Like It's ShotWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarija Velickovic / Kim Pak vs Abril Rosas Crow / Alexa Palomarez6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKarina Klein vs Leslie Stanfield3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Porter / Shirley Qiao vs Brittany Bemis / Clover Newman6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-20vs EW-PFC-SchnurmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea Porter / Karina Klein vs Anne Schnurman / Sara Hannigan6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarija Velickovic vs Kayla Sharp2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Pak / Shirley Qiao vs Linda Loretz / Judy Chessar7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Hoins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Deniz Inci Demirkanli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Marija Velickovic
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.14
Shirley Qiao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Andrea Porter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Kim Pak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.05
Karina Klein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Porter + Karina Klein224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amy Hoins
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Deniz Inci Demirkanli
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Marija Velickovic
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Shirley Qiao
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Andrea Porter
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kim Pak
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Karina Klein
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.