Teams

Whitman/55/4.0/M/POTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 55 & Over - Men · 4.0 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-22vs Eppler/55/4.0/M/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesFranklin Roemer / William Downs vs Robert Kyle / Robert Dean6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Whitman / Havard Yerger vs John Barr / Chip Layton3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTad Peters / Jerry Davis vs Todd Eppler / Timothy Ellis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-08vs Eppler/55/4.0/M/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesFranklin Roemer / Chris Howard vs Mike Fiser / Kevin Quinlan6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHavard Yerger / Edmund Brown vs John Barr / David Lowe7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarcy Henagan / Tad Peters vs Timothy Ellis / Todd Eppler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-01vs Eppler/55/4.0/M/BTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHavard Yerger / Edmund Brown vs Kevin Quinlan / Chris Miller6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJerry Davis / John Fertitta vs John Barr / Chip Layton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-25vs Eppler/55/4.0/M/BTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Downs / Franklin Roemer vs Todd Eppler / Randy Rossi6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHavard Yerger / Chris Howard vs Mike Fiser / Patric Dubois6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEdmund Brown / Jerry Davis vs Robert Kyle / Robert Dean5-7, 3-6
2025-01-18vs Eppler/55/4.0/M/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesFranklin Roemer / William Downs vs Timothy Ellis / Kevin Quinlan6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDarcy Henagan / Tad Peters vs David Lowe / Chris Miller3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHavard Yerger / John Mata vs John Barr / Chip Layton3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Chris Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Edmund Brown
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.79
Franklin Roemer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
William Whitman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Havard Yerger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.52
Darcy Henagan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Jerry Davis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Fertitta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tad Peters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Howard + William Whitman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Howard
19W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Edmund Brown
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Franklin Roemer
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
William Whitman
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Havard Yerger
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Darcy Henagan
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Jerry Davis
15W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
John Fertitta
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tad Peters
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.