Teams

RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK 40AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-21vs MERVYN MORRIS PK 40AW3.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesSonya Jubb / Sally Bang vs Linda Duchscherer / Christine Leong7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnita Dayton / Patti Pallito vs MELISSA de CASTRO / Leann Kanowsky3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Davis / Laura Blanton vs Katherine Greenberg / Manuela Robinson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Emilie Linick
published
3.12
Sonja Klein
published
3.06
Julie Askins
published
2.94
Sonya Jubb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Jeannie Choe
published
2.84
Sally Bang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Peyton Mason
published
2.65
Laura Blanton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Anita Dayton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Debra Aurora
published 3
Emily Brod
published
Patti Pallito
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Gambatese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Bang + Peyton Mason303 matchesnot enough data
Jeannie Choe + Sonja Klein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emilie Linick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Sonja Klein
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Julie Askins
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.06
Sonya Jubb
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Jeannie Choe
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Sally Bang
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Peyton Mason
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Laura Blanton
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
3
Anita Dayton
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
2.58
3
Debra Aurora
1W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Emily Brod
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Pallito
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Gambatese
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.