Teams

RBW-Armellino

2025 Adult 18 & Over · Open Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.94 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNikola Frljanic / Stefan Frljanic vs Ciprian Tais / James Fisher3-6, 3-6
2025-04-27vs NTC-Nordstrom Dawgs-FoleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesStefan Frljanic / Nikola Frljanic vs Chris Vrabel / Matthew Dunn3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNikola Frljanic vs Kyle Everly0-6, 0-6
2025-03-29vs NTC-Nordstrom Dawgs-FoleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefan Frljanic / Nikola Frljanic vs Kawika Lam / Jake Faundez1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.89
Alex Braksator
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.81
Jackson Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 5
Donny Baugh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.73
Maxim Shmotolokha
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.73
Daniel Armellino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.71
Aman Manji
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 5
4.55
Nikola Frljanic
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.43
Alexander Calpagiu
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.33
Andrew Huang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Stefan Frljanic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Yevgeniy Kolomiyets
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Armellino + Donny Baugh5554% games+6.5% vs expected
Daniel Armellino + Alexander Calpagiu8653% games+6.2% vs expected
Andrew Huang + Alexander Calpagiu4742% games−1.1% vs expected
Alexander Calpagiu + Donny Baugh5647% games−1.6% vs expected
Maxim Shmotolokha + Yevgeniy Kolomiyets4446% gamesnot enough data
Alex Braksator + Maxim Shmotolokha4363% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Armellino + Aman Manji2353% gamesnot enough data
Nikola Frljanic + Stefan Frljanic224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alex Braksator
58W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.89
5
Jackson Cobb
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Donny Baugh
83W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Maxim Shmotolokha
35W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Daniel Armellino
137W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Aman Manji
25W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
Nikola Frljanic
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Alexander Calpagiu
141W–100L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
5
Andrew Huang
83W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.33
Stefan Frljanic
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yevgeniy Kolomiyets
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.