Teams

CCV-Avery

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs WW-ConnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Harrison / Kirsti Goodwin vs Michelle Baker / John Baker3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRick Morris / Suzanne Morris vs Shirley Watkins / Robert Teele6-3, 6-3
2022-03-20vs ACAC-WilsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmmett Avery / Kirsti Goodwin vs Robbin Coleman / Thomas Wilson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-06vs HERM-HardestyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Clayton Worthington vs Krysten Bishop / Jon Nystrom3-6, 5-7
2022-02-27vs MAC-RamserWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Morris / Suzanne Morris vs Derek Swanson / Anne Wolff6-2, 6-2
2022-01-30vs ACAC-FieldsWon 10
W#1 DoublesClayton Worthington / Kirsti Goodwin vs Elham Tavassoli / Amir Tavassoli7-5, 3-2
2022-01-22vs BURK-ClarkWon 10
W#1 DoublesClayton Worthington / Kirsti Goodwin vs Samuel Poole / Modestine Carter2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-09vs SAL-NewmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRick Morris / Suzanne Morris vs Elizabeth Newman / Brian Consolvo3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Emmett Avery vs Brian Wright / Lauren Cecil6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Purcell
published 4
3.73
Ashley Millen
published 4
3.65
Suzanne Morris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
3.60
Scott Harrison
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
3.25
Emmett Avery
published 3.5
3.03
Connell Mullins
published 3.5
2.98
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Kim Cressy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Purcell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ashley Millen
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Suzanne Morris
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Scott Harrison
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Emmett Avery
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Connell Mullins
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.