Teams

CSU

2021 TRIO - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-04-10vs HMTCWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Pias / James Rose vs David Fanning / Kendal Sanders6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-07vs HMTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesJames Rose / Eric Sutherland vs Gary Westlind / Mark Sundstedt6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-03vs FCCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Pias / James Rose vs Robin Wick / Joseph Lillis6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Eric Sutherland
published 4
3.67
Cory Coombs
published 4
3.54
Alan Krech
published 4
3.28
James Rose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrew Hiller
published 3.5
Jon Leydens
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Sutherland
25W–18L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Cory Coombs
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Alan Krech
23W–29L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
James Rose
29W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Andrew Hiller
23W–18L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Jon Leydens
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.