Teams

WestonHill//Stillo

2026 Broward TriLevel · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-13vs Piccolo/PerillaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Jose Rivas vs ANDRES LOZANO / Roberto Gentile6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Tamayo / Jorge Nino vs Carlos Aldrey / Dorian Pieters0-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesJavier Irizarry / Rewal Alonso vs Jesus Hidalgo / Goldwasser Neto2-6, 4-6
2026-08-06vs Ltc/FormanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuan Camilo moya / Jose Rivas vs Ray Hilario / Eliu Montero5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlfonso Galindo / Alejandro Tamayo vs Michael OMahony / Kevin Gonzalez6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRewal Alonso / Luis Ardila vs James Mcdiffett / Mehdi Mohammadkhani4-6, 4-6
2026-07-30vs Veltri/SassonWon 30
W#1 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Jose Rivas vs Haim Sasson / Donovan Lue6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJorge Nino / Alfonso Galindo vs Enrique Guzman Barron Escobedo / Thomas Nguyen7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarlos Galvis / Rewal Alonso vs Ravi Seeram / Edward Ng6-3, 7-6
2026-07-16vs Parkland/AlexeyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJuan Camilo moya / Augusto Alizo vs Santiago Restrepo / Paul Newman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHaifeng Wang / Alfonso Galindo vs Kar Cheg / James Baseman5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJavier Irizarry / Luis Ardila vs Alexey Rasskazov / Egor Frantsevskiy6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ltc/Forman419614124
2Parkland/Alexey419614137
3Woodmont/Banham225716118
4WestonHill//Stillo135716125
5Veltri/Sasson1451021146
6Wrc/Thacker0551024162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Augusto Alizo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Francisco Garcia
published
3.55
Alfonso Galindo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Jorge Nino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Juan Camilo moya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Haifeng Wang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Luis Ardila
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Alejandro Tamayo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Javier Irizarry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Carlos Galvis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
EMILIO STILLO
published
3.08
Fernando Ely
published 3
2.88
Rewal Alonso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luis Ardila + Fernando Ely6068% games+12.5% vs expected
EMILIO STILLO + Alejandro Tamayo033 matchesnot enough data
EMILIO STILLO + Alfonso Galindo213 matchesnot enough data
Javier Irizarry + Luis Ardila303 matchesnot enough data
Alfonso Galindo + Carlos Galvis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Augusto Alizo
88W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Francisco Garcia
15W–24L career · no lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alfonso Galindo
60W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Jorge Nino
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Juan Camilo moya
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Haifeng Wang
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Luis Ardila
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
3.5
Alejandro Tamayo
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Javier Irizarry
50W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Carlos Galvis
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
EMILIO STILLO
6W–21L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Fernando Ely
15W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Rewal Alonso
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.