Teams

HG GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 2.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-04vs KNO SILVERLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatrina Hebert / Kay Langman vs Karla Goodhart / Molly Ehlinger2-6, 0-6
2024-08-21vs CR-DC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKay Langman / Stefania Scott vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Nadia Kudo6-0, 6-1
2024-08-14vs HW SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Custer / Stefania Scott vs Jessica Garnreiter / Kelly Tierney6-0, 6-2
2024-08-07vs SS-LT PINKLost 01
L#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Sarah Wells5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-31vs WC MAROONLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefania Scott / Sara Katt vs Dani Calkins / Cassie Perez1-6, 0-6
2024-07-24vs PRKR ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKay Langman / Katrina Hebert vs Heather Klusek / Eva Menachof6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi Custer vs Alyssa Shaw3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Heidi Custer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Jeni Anderson
published
2.32
Stefania Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Katrina Hebert
published
2.21
Cori Gummelt
published 2.5
2.19
Kay Langman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Beth Seuell
published 2.5
Heather Murry
published
Kristen Rosado
published
Sara Katt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Katt + Katrina Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Seuell + Katrina Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Stefania Scott + Heidi Custer213 matchesnot enough data
Jeni Anderson + Kay Langman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heidi Custer
67W–60L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Jeni Anderson
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
2.5
Stefania Scott
50W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
Katrina Hebert
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Cori Gummelt
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Kay Langman
22W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Beth Seuell
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Heather Murry
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Rosado
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Katt
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.