Teams

BTC:Sets in the City:Thomas

VT 2024 Combo 18 & Over Women · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-04vs BTC:WeissSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Victoria Luksch vs Lauren Bakewell / Laura Cawley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarge McDonnell / Cindy Fonseca vs Jennifer Weiss / Laura Williams3-6, 3-6
2024-07-21vs BTC:Rally Cats:CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Strausser / Marge McDonnell vs Caroline Murphy / Chaska Richardson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVictoria Luksch / Jeanne Blackmore vs Liz Demas / Lesli Nichols6-0, 6-1
2024-07-14vs BTC:WeissWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Stephanie Rouleau vs Carrie Wulfman / Jennifer Weiss2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarge McDonnell / Lisa Strausser vs Lauren Bakewell / Judith Wimble6-0, 6-2
2024-07-07vs BTC:MelenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarge McDonnell / Lisa Strausser vs Cynthia Sherburne / Linda Morgan-Yatzor3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Victoria Luksch vs Katherine Arthaud / Laney Bevill6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-30vs BTC:Rally Cats:CookSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Victoria Luksch vs Lesli Nichols / Chaska Richardson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Rouleau / Lisa Strausser vs Alana Lowry / Beth Cook6-3, 6-3
2024-06-16vs BTC:MelenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCindy Fonseca / Melissa Thomas vs Cynthia Hesslink / Katherine Arthaud2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeidre Riehle / Stephanie Rouleau vs Laney Bevill / Jude Melen1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Melen518411106
2BTC:Rally Cats:Cook335714107
3BTC:Sets in the City:Thomas246615107
4BTC:Weiss245716110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Stephanie Rouleau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Victoria Luksch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Jeanne Blackmore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Lisa Strausser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Cindy Fonseca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Deidre Riehle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Marge McDonnell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Luksch + Jeanne Blackmore51048% games−1.7% vs expected
Lisa Strausser + Marge McDonnell3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rouleau
42W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.90
Victoria Luksch
68W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Jeanne Blackmore
63W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Lisa Strausser
64W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Fonseca
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Deidre Riehle
36W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marge McDonnell
22W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.