Teams

ETC:Play It Forwards:Kavanagh

2023 WMA Tri-Level Fall (2023) · 3.0 Women 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-01vs ETC:KMA:BurnsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Kavanagh / Elaine Grocott vs Kimberly Burns / Moira Murphy6-1, 6-2
2023-11-30vs LTC:Slice Girls:Roux/HaddockWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Kavanagh / Elizabeth Norman vs Cindy Haddock / Debbie Santos6-1, 6-1
2023-11-20vs LTC:CroteauWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Salka / Elaine Grocott vs Suzanne Streeter / Jennifer Puhalski6-0, 6-4
2023-11-18vs ETC:Tri-Hards:Forde/RakasWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Norman / Alison Salka vs Margaret Rakas / Anne Wheeler6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJessica Kavanagh / Alison Salka vs Elyse Post Perez / Stephanie Foster6-3, 6-0
2023-10-29vs LTC:Impact:HunterWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Norman / Elaine Grocott vs Catherine Wickens / Cheryl Albano7-6, 2-1
2023-10-19vs LTC:GTP:Jordan/TerrincaWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaine Grocott / Alison Salka vs Eileen Jordan / Linda Terrinca6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Jessica Kavanagh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Alison Salka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth Norman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Elaine Grocott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Norman + Elaine Grocott13466% games+12.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Norman + Alison Salka8176% games+11.3% vs expected
Jessica Kavanagh + Alison Salka17463% games+11.1% vs expected
Elaine Grocott + Alison Salka8069% games+10.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Norman + Jessica Kavanagh10168% games+8.8% vs expected
Elaine Grocott + Jessica Kavanagh314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Kavanagh
66W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Alison Salka
86W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Norman
79W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Elaine Grocott
95W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.