Teams

CDTA S TriW35.40.45 4.LifeSport(OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $23

CDTA 1Summer Tri Level · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.89 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
L#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Cyndy Krietsch vs J'Ana Diamond / Keara Miller3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Rudolphi / Wendy Otte vs Pamela Leichtling / Christine Munteanu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-08-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Susan Rudolphi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCris Montresor / Anne Sopiarz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCris Montresor / Wendy Otte vs Sophia Koliatsis / Mariana Alberro6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShelley Majewski / Juliann Abderholden vs Elizabeth Tunney / Nicole Perso5-7, 5-1, 0-1
W#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Cyndy Krietsch vs Katharine Cole / Grace Hahn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Rudolphi / Cris Montresor vs Allison Goldberg / Priscilla Ewaldz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSusan Rudolphi / Cyndy Krietsch vs J'Ana Diamond / Keara Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Otte / Juliann Abderholden vs Susan Klumpner / Christine Munteanu0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Majewski / Heather Friese vs Sarah W Johnson / Illana Hodges5-7, 5-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Kiernan / Bryan Kintanar vs Andrew Wolfberg / Robert Rao6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Kiernan / Tyler Ko vs Brian Thomason / Thomas Tranter4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Cyndy Krietsch vs J'Ana Diamond / Jill Siegel2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJuliann Abderholden / Heather Friese vs Illana Hodges / Emily Lund5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTyler Ko / Daniel Kiernan vs Brian Thomason / Thomas Tranter7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Cris Montresor vs Shana Cal / Katharine Cole0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Majewski / Juliann Abderholden vs Brooke Kuehnle / Patricia Lozada6-7, 2-4
L#1 DoublesSusan Rudolphi / Colette Gramins vs Christine Meade / Jennifer Goldfarb3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Friese / Anne Sopiarz vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Sue Wissing6-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesColette Gramins / Cyndy Krietsch vs Erin Kramer / Martha Davis6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendy Otte / Juliann Abderholden vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Ali Gerstad7-6, 1-4
L#3 DoublesHeather Friese / Cindi Papas vs Irene Salerno / Judy Godinho2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S TriW35.40.45 1.Lake Bluff Goldberg Sun 4 $228124311146
2CDTA S TriW35.40.45 2.Tam Corey Sat 11 $2254131431239
3CDTA S TriW35.40.45 3.Tam Landt Sun 3 $2245111634240
4CDTA S TriW35.40.45 4.LifeSport(OUT) Kiernan Sat 9 $231852244273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Colette Gramins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Daniel Kiernan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Cyndy Krietsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Cris Montresor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Anne Sopiarz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Susan Rudolphi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Irene Okada
published 3.5
Heather Friese
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Juliann Abderholden
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Cindi Papas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Shelley Majewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Otte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndy Krietsch + Colette Gramins7651% games+0.6% vs expected
Juliann Abderholden + Heather Friese1630% games−2.7% vs expected
Susan Rudolphi + Colette Gramins2447% gamesnot enough data
Juliann Abderholden + Cris Montresor224 matchesnot enough data
Juliann Abderholden + Shelley Majewski033 matchesnot enough data
Cris Montresor + Colette Gramins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Colette Gramins
70W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Daniel Kiernan
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Cyndy Krietsch
11W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Cris Montresor
37W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Anne Sopiarz
2W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Susan Rudolphi
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
3.5
Irene Okada
130W–68L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Heather Friese
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Juliann Abderholden
13W–38L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3
Cindi Papas
29W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Shelley Majewski
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Otte
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.