Teams

RVR RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-31vs HCC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Yoko Smith Rhodes vs Tammy Schiff / Erin Jones5-7, 2-6
2024-07-24vs SMGLR REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Michelle Bevington vs Darcy Conover / Jodi Jacobson6-2, 6-1
2024-07-20vs GSCC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Kellman / Carla Ostberg vs Carolyn Strautman / Lynn Aliya6-3, 6-1
2024-07-17vs CROWN REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesYoko Smith Rhodes / Carla Ostberg vs Colleen Barill / Amy Daniel6-0, 6-2
2024-07-10vs GSCC PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAudrey Imhoff / Carla Ostberg vs Susie Demers / Doreen Young3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-06-26vs AG REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Ostberg / Anne Goldberg vs Claire Green / Barbara Sport6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Katie Bailey
published
3.46
Carla Ostberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.24
Katie Karow
published
3.16
Audrey Imhoff
published 3.5
3.14
Yoko Smith Rhodes
published
3.08
Michelle Bevington
published
2.92
Anne Goldberg
published 3
2.88
Carrie Kellman
published 3
2.75
Karen Fullerton
published
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
published
Patsy Isaacson
published
Suzi Jenkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Imhoff + Carla Ostberg6260% games+10.7% vs expected
Audrey Imhoff + Michelle Bevington404 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Imhoff + Katie Bailey404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Bevington + Carrie Kellman314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Goldberg + Carrie Kellman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Bailey
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carla Ostberg
83W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Katie Karow
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Audrey Imhoff
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Yoko Smith Rhodes
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Michelle Bevington
17W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Anne Goldberg
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Carrie Kellman
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Karen Fullerton
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Richlyn Pavcek
20W–33L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
Patsy Isaacson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzi Jenkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.