Teams

Just Buck(horn) It - J. Torres

2024 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-23vs SVB - T. Vande BergWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Holland / Ben DeBrocke vs Shashikiran Suresh / DENIS LYNHAM6-4, 6-2
2024-02-24vs Cheval Knights - K. StaggsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Stone / Anthony Lizares vs Jason Lichtman / Harish Manohar6-3, 6-4
2024-02-03vs Florida/Orsini/18&Over4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Stone / Anthony Lizares vs Ken Jackson / Chris New3-6, 4-6
2024-01-20vs The D.I. Deuces - T. WendelLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Stone / John Holland vs Reece Hickok / Caleb Hirsch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Brian Stone
published 4
3.90
Sebastian Graba
published
3.87
David Bounds
published 4
3.79
Daniel Bulso
published 4
3.76
Hansil Kalaria
published
Anthony Lizares
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Gregory Betza
published
3.64
Ben DeBrocke
published 4
3.63
John Orr
published
3.63
Raymond Jozwiak
published
3.58
Derek DeBrocke
published 4
3.43
EA Gray
published
3.40
Chris Chee-A-Tow
published 3.5
John Holland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joseph Harrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Orr + Gregory Betza4649% games+1.7% vs expected
Ben DeBrocke + Sebastian Graba1545% gamesnot enough data
Sebastian Graba + Hansil Kalaria404 matchesnot enough data
Brian Stone + Sebastian Graba213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Stone + David Bounds213 matchesnot enough data
Ben DeBrocke + John Orr213 matchesnot enough data
John Orr + Hansil Kalaria123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Stone
26W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Sebastian Graba
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
David Bounds
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Daniel Bulso
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Hansil Kalaria
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Anthony Lizares
96W–97L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Gregory Betza
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Ben DeBrocke
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
John Orr
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Raymond Jozwiak
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Derek DeBrocke
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
EA Gray
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Chris Chee-A-Tow
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
John Holland
60W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Harrington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.