Teams

Mansfield

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-12vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - 2025 WinterWon 32
W#1 DoublesKimberly Mueller / Katie Wessman vs Molly Hemes / Marti Estey6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Sofia Terzic3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Peterson / Gina Carlson vs Cecilia Grass-Neary / Ann McNamara2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKelsey Aden vs Jane Booth-Tobin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Ring / Suzy Griffith vs Genevieve Swanson / Kristine Paul6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-05vs Jorgenson-Coffield Point TakenSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShanshan Ge / Andrea Peterson vs Kristin Hartley / Brenda Martinson6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJane Lent vs Lauren Madsen6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Carlson / Jennifer Johnson vs Alesha Baerenwald / Emily Walz Lockhart3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVirginia Kuberski vs Theresa Carlson5-7, 2-6
2025-02-05vs Estey-Alexander 4.5 - 2025 WinterLost 14
L#1 DoublesAndrea Peterson / Jane Lent vs Brittany Alexander / Mona Oenning1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShanshan Ge vs Brooke Hapuku6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Aden / Gina Carlson vs Andrea Boado / Molly Hemes3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesVirginia Kuberski vs Ann Cadwallader1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jayne Crocker / Jennifer Johnson vs Genevieve Swanson / Kristine Paul6-4, 6-4
2025-01-29vs REILING-STOUT 4.5s WINTERWon 32
L#1 DoublesJane Lent / Andrea Peterson vs Amy Mitchell / Anna Lyon7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShanshan Ge vs Anna Nguyen6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Feagler / Laura Astrup vs Margaret Kelley / Rhonda Greene2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLeslie Connelly vs Katherine Arneson7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKimberly Mueller / Katie Wessman vs Mary Kuna / Lea Blackwell Favor6-4, 6-4
2025-01-15vs Jorgenson-Coffield Point TakenWon 41
W#1 DoublesKelsey Aden / Karen Feagler vs Taylor Reiners / Brenda Martinson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLeslie Connelly vs Allison Ranallo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuzy Griffith / Janice Ring vs Theresa Carlson / Kristin Hartley4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesShanshan Ge vs Michelle Finlon6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Lent / Kimberly Mueller vs Isabel Thiner / Jennifer Jorgenson7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Katie Wessman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Kelsey Aden
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
Jane Lent
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.06
Shanshan Ge
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.04
Lesley Longval
published
3.97
Leslie Connelly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.94
Karen Feagler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Mary Jayne Crocker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Janice Ring
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Virginia Kuberski
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.67
Kimberly Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Suzy Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.45
Gina Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Laura Astrup
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Ring + Suzy Griffith141549% games+3.0% vs expected
Kimberly Mueller + Katie Wessman3254% gamesnot enough data
Gina Carlson + Mary Jayne Crocker224 matchesnot enough data
Shanshan Ge + Gina Carlson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Wessman
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Kelsey Aden
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Jane Lent
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Shanshan Ge
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
Lesley Longval
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Leslie Connelly
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.97
Karen Feagler
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Mary Jayne Crocker
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Janice Ring
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Virginia Kuberski
68W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Kimberly Mueller
24W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Suzy Griffith
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Gina Carlson
19W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Laura Astrup
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.