Teams

OP:Whitney

2025 ME Adult 65 & Over Men · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-24vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayLost 12
L#1 DoublesTodd Whitney / Christopher Myers vs Jeffrey Barrett / John Kendall4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBob Tkacik / Thomas Toohey vs Chuck Shumway / Amos Eno2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarc Silver / Raymond Jean vs Wilbur Shardlow / Ken Boykin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-17vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Myers / Glenn Zaharis vs John Kendall / Ken Boykin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichard McLeod / Wayne Fay vs Chuck Shumway / Gene Kucinkas6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-10vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Whitney / Richard McLeod vs Roger Gagne / Roy Cobean4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Wayne Fay vs Chuck Shumway / Wilbur Shardlow1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Silver / Mark Mueller vs Jeffrey Barrett / Richard Meisenbach6-2, 6-0
2025-07-13vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Toohey / Glenn Zaharis vs Chuck Shumway / Steven Wright4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Wayne Fay vs Jerome Faure / Amos Eno6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRaymond Jean / Mark Mueller vs Jeffrey Barrett / Roy Cobean2-6, 4-6
2025-07-06vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Toohey / Marc Silver vs Jeffrey Barrett / John Kendall4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Wayne Fay vs Amos Eno / Steven Wright6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTodd Whitney / Richard McLeod vs Chuck Shumway / Ken Boykin1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-29vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Tkacik / Mark Mueller vs Roger Gagne / John Kendall4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMarc Silver / Glenn Zaharis vs Jerome Faure / Ken Boykin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTodd Whitney / Richard McLeod vs Richard Meisenbach / Jeffrey Barrett6-0, 6-1
2025-06-22vs OP:MainelyOldGuys:ShumwayLost 12
L#1 DoublesBob Tkacik / Marc Silver vs Jeffrey Barrett / John Kendall5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLouis Rana / Raymond Jean vs Chuck Shumway / Ken Boykin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesH Terence Hampson / Wayne Fay vs Gene Kucinkas / Amos Eno2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OP:MainelyOldGuys:Shumway5212923203
2OP:Whitney2591227190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Richard McLeod
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
H Terence Hampson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Bob Tkacik
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Christopher Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Glenn Zaharis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Louis Rana
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Silver
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Raymond Jean
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Lauzon
published
Thomas Toohey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Todd Whitney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Wayne Fay
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenn Zaharis + Thomas Toohey1536% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Fay + H Terence Hampson4249% gamesnot enough data
Bob Tkacik + H Terence Hampson2346% gamesnot enough data
Glenn Zaharis + Christopher Myers044 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Myers + Wayne Fay044 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Jean + Thomas Toohey303 matchesnot enough data
Richard McLeod + Todd Whitney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard McLeod
51W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
H Terence Hampson
95W–120L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3
Bob Tkacik
6W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Christopher Myers
29W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Glenn Zaharis
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Louis Rana
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marc Silver
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Mueller
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Jean
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Lauzon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Toohey
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Whitney
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Fay
5W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.