← Teams

MPRC-Hettle

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.8 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Allison Buchman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
3.77
Shannon Roarke
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.70
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Aracelia Hettle
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Robin Kaukonen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Maryam Farinola
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Jana Hirst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results5 ties
2020-03-07Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesNancy Atkins / Colleen Hamilton vs Kristi Vargas / Kristin Lyman6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Buchman vs Leslie Lynch7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Roarke / Sheila Anderson vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Ann Skoog6-3, 6-4
2020-02-22Split 2–2
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs KEELEY PLOMBON6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Kathleen Schlickeiser vs Christy Strange / Kristen Kopack6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAllison Buchman vs Helen Deduonni6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesBarb Lipscomb / Jana Hirst vs Sarah Yu / Kaye Johnson6-4, 6-3
2020-02-01Lost 1–4
L#1 DoublesShannon Roarke / Kathleen Schlickeiser vs Krista Mikalatos / Julie Atchley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Mera Cosgrove6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHong Huynh / Judi Babcock vs Terri Bashkingy / Carol Chiu6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRobin Kaukonen vs Candi Kleiva6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Pancoast / Adrienne VanBeckhoven vs Heather Watkins / Kristin de Baldo6-4, 7-6
2020-01-25Lost 0–5
L#1 DoublesTerry Mettler / Maryam Farinola vs Kathleen Goodfriend / Mary Elliott7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Libby North6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJana Hirst / Kathleen Budnick vs Tara Hendrickson / Sherry Rogers6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAllison Buchman vs Ashleigh Kayser4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Kaukonen / Jennifer Pancoast vs Jana Corder / Char Riley6-0, 6-3
2020-01-19Won 4–1
L#1 DoublesColleen Hamilton / Robin Kaukonen vs Stephanie Leeding / Gina Wissmiller6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Lori Bernhardt6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Adrienne VanBeckhoven vs Sally Lovett / Linda Lovett5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAllison Buchman vs Janae Pyle6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSheila Anderson / Shannon Roarke vs Shannon Bilstrom / Nikki Metcalf6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Allison Buchman
95W–27L career
not enough data
—
4
Shannon Roarke
84W–20L career
1%99%1%
3.77
4
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
39W–22L career
3%97%0%
3.70
4
Aracelia Hettle
71W–44L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Robin Kaukonen
23W–53L career
1%97%2%
3.28
3.5
Maryam Farinola
55W–59L career
not enough data
—
3
Jana Hirst
33W–66L career
0%66%34%
3.03

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.