Teams

SC 9.0W 55 & Over (Budreau)

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · Women 9.0 Combined

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-08vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristine OKeefe / Shelley Humes vs Brenda Fisher / Lydia Vaughan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTamara Simone / Vicki Nagy vs Deborah Bonser / Sandy Gillis6-2, 6-0
2026-04-01vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Hobbs / Janice Budreau vs Harriet Pollitzer / Nancy Ficarella6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKimberly Alessi / Tamara Simone vs Wendy Jones / Sandy Gillis6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVicki Nagy / Christine OKeefe vs Kristin Lueken / Deborah Bonser1-0
2026-03-26vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Budreau / Kimberly Alessi vs Michele Archibald / Deborah Bonser6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Clark / Dava Baumann vs Donna Bierschenk / Kristin Lueken6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShelley Humes / Christine OKeefe vs Stacie Hunt / Wendy Jones4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-18vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 21
W#1 DoublesTamara Simone / Cindi Reiman vs Brenda Fisher / Sylvia Gross2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanice Budreau / Sue Leffler vs Michele Archibald / Kristin Lueken6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Karen Kemmerer vs Stacie Hunt / Kim Kelly4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-18vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Budreau / Kimberly Alessi vs Kim Kelly / Donna Bierschenk6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Clark / Cindi Reiman vs Michele Archibald / Brenda Fisher6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristine OKeefe / Dava Baumann vs Sylvia Gross / Stacie Hunt4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-18vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 21
L#1 DoublesSue Leffler / Tracy Hobbs vs Donna Bierschenk / Sylvia Gross1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine OKeefe / Cindi Reiman vs Harriet Pollitzer / Wendy Jones6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Karen Kemmerer vs Nancy Ficarella / Lydia Vaughan6-0, 6-1
2026-02-11vs HHTL55/Archibald/Port RoyalWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Budreau / Kimberly Alessi vs Brenda Fisher / Sylvia Gross6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Humes / Cindi Reiman vs Stacie Hunt / Kim Kelly6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Karen Kemmerer vs Michele Archibald / Kristin Lueken6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 9.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SC 9.0W 55 & Over (Budreau)6116514137
2HHTL55/Archibald/Port Royal1651635217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Tracy Hobbs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Sue Leffler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.40
Janice Budreau
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.40
Cindi Reiman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Dava Baumann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.29
Karen Kemmerer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Kimberly Alessi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.13
Ann Clark
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.08
Tamara Simone
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Christine OKeefe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.88
Shelley Humes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Vicki Nagy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Budreau + Kimberly Alessi6071% games+10.3% vs expected
Tracy Hobbs + Sue Leffler14171% games+6.2% vs expected
Dava Baumann + Janice Budreau5170% gamesnot enough data
Ann Clark + Tamara Simone5069% gamesnot enough data
Ann Clark + Karen Kemmerer314 matchesnot enough data
Vicki Nagy + Ann Clark213 matchesnot enough data
Dava Baumann + Christine OKeefe123 matchesnot enough data
Cindi Reiman + Tamara Simone303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Hobbs
69W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
4.47
Sue Leffler
62W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
4.47
Janice Budreau
23W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Cindi Reiman
18W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Dava Baumann
33W–25L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Karen Kemmerer
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Kimberly Alessi
14W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Ann Clark
45W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Tamara Simone
32W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christine OKeefe
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
4.06
Shelley Humes
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Vicki Nagy
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.