Teams

Stone NE 4.0+W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 4.0+ Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs James NE 4.0+WLost 12
L#1 SinglesHannah Grimes vs Amanda James3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeanne Pounders vs Danielle Arnsdorff2-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAmanda Howell vs Kelly Young2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Martin NC 4.0+WLost 12
W#1 SinglesDana Bray vs Kristi McCrory6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesHannah Grimes vs Caitlin Thomas5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAshley Roberson vs Holly Bigham1-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Alford NC 4.0+WWon 21
W#1 SinglesDana Bray vs Kristen Alexander4-0
L#2 SinglesHannah Grimes vs Nelli Golmeeva3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAmanda Howell vs Mandy Alford7-5, 6-3
2025-02-28vs James NE 4.0+WWon 21
W#1 SinglesDana Bray vs Danielle Arnsdorff6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeanne Pounders vs Judy Bumgardner6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAmanda Howell vs Kelly Young2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0+ Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Dana Bray
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Ashley Roberson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.64
Hannah Grimes
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Amanda Howell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Leanne Pounders
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Bray
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Ashley Roberson
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hannah Grimes
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Amanda Howell
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
Leanne Pounders
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.