Teams

Fretz/Pike-Cady W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W4.0S

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-01vs Greenhill/Colaluca-Richter W4.0SLost 13
W#1 DoublesMichaela Cady / Mary Alyce Kaetzel vs Mary Helen Nine / Jennifer Richter7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarissa Saluja vs Julie Hoang4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Dugan / Melissa Stevenson vs Avari Garcia / Jamie Debusk-Loop2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesAndrea Bradford / Laura Rich vs Kelly Britson / Hilary Roberts7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Lauren Sheaks
published
3.79
Michaela Cady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Marissa Saluja
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Sundee McDonald
published
3.60
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Melissa Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Lea Plamann
published
3.48
Cristin Pike
published 3.5
3.44
Stephanie Shah
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Andrea Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Debbie Munir
published 4
3.33
Jennifer Dugan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Dugan + Sundee McDonald3355% games+9.9% vs expected
Lauren Sheaks + Lea Plamann2360% games+5.0% vs expected
Debbie Munir + Andrea Bradford1732% games−2.4% vs expected
Mary Alyce Kaetzel + Sundee McDonald5446% games−6.3% vs expected
Cristin Pike + Mary Alyce Kaetzel2348% gamesnot enough data
Cristin Pike + Michaela Cady134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Alyce Kaetzel + Michaela Cady314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Stevenson + Michaela Cady123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Sheaks
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
Michaela Cady
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Marissa Saluja
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Sundee McDonald
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Mary Alyce Kaetzel
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Melissa Stevenson
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lea Plamann
9W–23L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cristin Pike
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Stephanie Shah
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Bradford
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
4
Debbie Munir
4W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jennifer Dugan
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.