Teams

MLVWeber/Westport

2022 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 8.0 Mon pm 55s

12 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs MLBKUmar/ PAC 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesHelen Bugg / Edward Bugg vs Will Robinson / Cheryl Robinson7-6, 6-4
2022-08-01vs MLPAte/NMPWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristy Bolick / Kevin Hawkins vs Karen Dziadziola / Eric Reed6-3, 6-2
2022-07-18vs MLBKUmar/ PAC 55+Won 20
W#1 DoublesCorey Cornacchio / Becky Heflin vs Rolfe Schnur / Kathy Henry6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHelen Bugg / Edward Bugg vs Jeff Lloyd / Christine Nilson6-3, 6-0
2022-07-11vs MLPAte/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Hawkins / Christy Bolick vs LuAnne Pate / Eric Reed6-1, 6-0
2022-07-01vs MLBKUmar/ PAC 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesArnaud Couturier / Shaun Simmer vs Kathy Henry / Rolfe Schnur6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-13vs MLPAte/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Levy / Arnaud Couturier vs William Hirata / Julie Mudge3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Heflin / Scott Darden vs Leslie Shipley / Fred Dwiggins6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 8.0 Mon pm 55s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Brenda Levy
published 4.5
3.94
Kevin Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Corey Cornacchio
published 4
3.80
Christy Bolick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Becky Heflin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Nancy Miller
published
3.68
Arnaud Couturier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Helen Bugg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Edward Bugg
published 4
3.42
John Weber
published
3.07
Vicki Weber
published
Shaun Simmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Heflin + Kevin Hawkins2353% gamesnot enough data
Christy Bolick + Kevin Hawkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brenda Levy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Kevin Hawkins
119W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Corey Cornacchio
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Christy Bolick
311W–125L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Becky Heflin
324W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Nancy Miller
82W–52L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Arnaud Couturier
122W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Helen Bugg
164W–86L career · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Edward Bugg
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
John Weber
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Vicki Weber
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Shaun Simmer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.