Teams

Nundkumar - 18+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-29vs Mays-HPCC - 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaggie Riley / Lesley Rossato vs Brandi Jacques / Jennifer Mays5-7, 2-6
2022-09-22vs Kraska 18+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesSara Nundkumar / Maggie Riley vs Carole Albright / Ramona Parsaei6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs Brewer 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Richardson / Lesley Rossato vs Dabney Porter / Andrea Pollina3-6, 5-7
2022-08-25vs McFarlin 18+ 7.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Beeson / Maggie Riley vs Shawn McFarlin / Julia Barnes6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Richardson / Melissa Baker vs Kathy Hedgecock / Tammie Hughes6-2, 6-0
2022-08-11vs Mays-HPCC - 18+ 7.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Beeson / Erin Richardson vs Erin Huffines / Madison Bowen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Christina Rush
published 4.5
4.15
Ai Terui
published 4.5
3.98
Jordan Hedrick
published
3.81
Michele Alvarino
published
3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.59
Lori Harrington
published
3.59
Maggie Riley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Pamela Rosendale
published
3.56
Melissa Beeson
published
3.54
Tammy Kasik
published
3.48
Melissa Baker
published
3.44
Erin Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Lesley Rossato
published
LAISBETH HIGUEREY
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Nundkumar + Michele Alvarino3257% games+5.8% vs expected
Melissa Baker + Lori Harrington4353% games+3.2% vs expected
Melissa Beeson + Ai Terui123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Rush
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Ai Terui
9W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Jordan Hedrick
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
3.98
Michele Alvarino
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.81
Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Lori Harrington
47W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.59
Maggie Riley
52W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Pamela Rosendale
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Melissa Beeson
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Tammy Kasik
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Melissa Baker
37W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Erin Richardson
92W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Lesley Rossato
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.35
LAISBETH HIGUEREY
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.