Teams

LMCA - Cassidy 5.0 / Caldwell Park

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 2.5 Women Wednesday 18s

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs LSSW - Swaney & Siler/JettonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Cassidy / Melissa Marlowe vs Bailie Kopco / Geraldine Gardner5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDayna Celcev / Grace Helmuth vs Taylor Gill / Shannon O'Bryan Cerza6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDanita Blake / Tonya Bishop vs Amy Froemming / Lisa Price2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Cassidy / Sally Vacca vs CHRISTINA PHILLIPS / Kerri Powell6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSarah Teague / Dayna Celcev vs Laura Gagel / Cindy Orr1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMelissa Marlowe / Grace Helmuth vs Amanda Matheny / Amy Kotek3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Cassidy / Tonya Bishop vs Corinne Deuel / Deborah Lukan6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGrace Helmuth / Melissa Marlowe vs Bobbi Hoppe / Rona Juban6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Teague / Beverly Futrell vs Patty Reich / Samantha Mallette6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Wednesday 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Sally Vacca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
Michelle Cassidy
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.58
Grace Helmuth
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.52
Tonya Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.45
Sarah Teague
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Dayna Celcev
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Melissa Marlowe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Helmuth + Melissa Marlowe4256% games+7.9% vs expected
Michelle Cassidy + Sally Vacca4457% games+6.5% vs expected
Michelle Cassidy + Grace Helmuth9458% games+4.5% vs expected
Sally Vacca + Melissa Marlowe3251% games−1.2% vs expected
Michelle Cassidy + Tonya Bishop314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Sally Vacca
41W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.80
2.5
Michelle Cassidy
59W–36L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%19%81%
2.62
2.5
Grace Helmuth
54W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
2.5
Tonya Bishop
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Sarah Teague
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Dayna Celcev
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.43
Melissa Marlowe
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.