Teams

EAnderson (Park Road)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-08vs JGentile (WSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMadelynn Bates / Maura Drewry vs Sandra Torres / Gabriela ROY1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMallory Burns / Marissa Martin vs April Greer / Jacqui Gentile2-6, 1-6
2024-09-18vs MRawlings/DDeArmas (Bridgehampton)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaura Drewry / Mallory Burns vs Johanne Bulger / Christina McDonald2-6, 1-6
2024-09-11vs KGreathouse (Park Road)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDevon Fuller / Madelynn Bates vs Mary Margaret Banner / Annie Hart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMallory Burns / Maura Drewry vs Jane Bee / Shelley Minor5-7, 3-6
2024-09-05vs PStyers (Southampton)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllie Doub / Madelynn Bates vs Rhonda McLean / Andrea Cossette2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-28vs JLee/ESalim (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDevon Fuller / Allie Doub vs Elisa Salim / Jenny Kim1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Lillibridge / Madelynn Bates vs Kris Jones / Sun Moon1-6, 6-7
2024-08-21vs BBaker (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAllie Doub / Madelynn Bates vs Brittany Baker / Danielle Gier1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMallory Burns / Katherine Stencel vs Katie Archer / Anna T Heath6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Caroline Skjoedt
published 3.5
3.32
Devon Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.10
Emma SEGAL
published 3
3.05
Emilia Anderson
published
3.00
Madelynn Bates
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.93
Mallory Burns
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.74
Allie Doub
published 3
2.72
Marissa Martin
published
2.67
Lindsay Lillibridge
published
Katherine Stencel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emma SEGAL + Emilia Anderson7168% games+8.6% vs expected
Emma SEGAL + Devon Fuller404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Skjoedt
14W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3
Devon Fuller
96W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Emma SEGAL
28W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.10
Emilia Anderson
37W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.05
3
Madelynn Bates
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Mallory Burns
45W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Allie Doub
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Marissa Martin
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Lindsay Lillibridge
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%12%88%
2.67
Katherine Stencel
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.