Teams

ACAC Bryan 6.5

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-13vs MRTC Williams 6.5 Men ComboLost 02
L#1 DoublesGlenn Pfluger / David Naputi vs Irvin Banks / Malcolm Bickley5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTravis Williams / Alexander Smith vs Kevin Carter / Benjamin Pham2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-24vs MTC Honey Badgers 6.5 - CutlipWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Hollowell / Mark Lutterbie vs Adam Boyer / Christopher Geoghegan6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Naputi / Glenn Pfluger vs Mark Beattie / Kenneth Madrigal6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPeter Olson / Travis Williams vs Chad Currie / Juan Mejia7-5, 6-2
2025-08-16vs Mercurio Chestnut Oaks 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHamilton Bryan / Glenn Pfluger vs Patrick Barranger / Sam Cohen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hollowell / Thomas Chelimsky vs Robert Mercurio / Henry Daniel3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Naputi / Bennett Lee vs Michael Coyle / Brian Gearing7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-10vs Avalon Ghita 6.5 ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexander Smith / Anthony Hunt vs Todd Milligan / Jeremy Kokemor2-6, 2-6
2025-08-02vs Dominion DykesLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexander Smith / Mark Lutterbie vs Varun Mehta / Jamie OToole4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRodney Orcutt / Chris Young vs Richard Cifaldi / Seth Kreiser1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHamilton Bryan / Radim Varys vs Patrick Jernigan / George Drudge1-6, 2-6
2025-07-27vs Avalon StowersWon 10
W#3 DoublesBennett Lee / Anthony Hunt vs Ford Sleeman / Ian Watt6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Glenn Pfluger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Anthony Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Alexander Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Craig Anderson
published 3
2.89
Mark Lutterbie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Peter Olson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Radim Varys
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
David Naputi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Bennett Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Robert Peskind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Hamilton Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Rodney Orcutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Chelimsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Travis Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
William Hollowell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Olson + Craig Anderson3940% games−2.1% vs expected
Mark Lutterbie + Alexander Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Glenn Pfluger
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
3.5
Anthony Hunt
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Alexander Smith
18W–36L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Craig Anderson
20W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Mark Lutterbie
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Peter Olson
24W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Radim Varys
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
David Naputi
27W–27L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Bennett Lee
13W–14L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Robert Peskind
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Hamilton Bryan
12W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Rodney Orcutt
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Chelimsky
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Travis Williams
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Hollowell
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.