Teams

Plankenhorn Tri Level 3.5 40

2022 Tri-Level 40 and Over · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Susan Jensen
published
3.17
Judy Wiles
published
2.78
Julie Ashcraft
published
2.63
Rebecca Rieniets
published
2.61
Kerri Plankenhorn
published
2.47
Terri Good
published
2.42
Shelley Hopkins
published
1.96
Serena Neely
published
Judy Darwin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Jensen
35W–32L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Judy Wiles
61W–81L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Julie Ashcraft
25W–30L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Rebecca Rieniets
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Kerri Plankenhorn
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61
Terri Good
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Shelley Hopkins
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.42
Serena Neely
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Judy Darwin
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.