Teams

Duval - Williams Y - Clark

2021 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-11vs Baymeadows - LansangWon 10
W#1 SinglesGina Carman vs Anne Billion5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-06-26vs Boone Park - HarrisSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGina Carman vs Steffi Stiefel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Curley / Kathy Roan vs Jacqueline Harris / Reiko Sheridan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-12vs Latta-RainesWon 10
W#1 SinglesGina Carman vs Temeka Perry7-5, 4-3
2021-06-05vs Ponte Vedra - EganWon 10
W#1 SinglesGina Carman vs Jacqueline Bell Egan7-6, 6-3
2021-05-22vs Boone Park - HarrisWon 10
W#1 SinglesGina Carman vs Katie Deering6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesGina Carman vs Yetta Goolsby6-1, 6-2
2021-05-08vs Latta-RainesWon 20
W#2 SinglesGina Carman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Scott / Kathy Roan vs Julie Palus / Julia Richardson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Carolina Rechy
published 4.5
Gina Carman
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.08
Claudia Eikner
published 4.5
3.88
Kristen Surface
published
3.85
Kelly Atkins
published
3.76
Kathy Roan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Raquel Clark
published
Amy Curley
published 4
3.69
Andrea Frick
published 4
3.33
Laurie Scott
published
3.22
Kimberly Besser
published
Loretta Zubero
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Atkins + Kathy Roan3351% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carolina Rechy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Gina Carman
31W–24L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Claudia Eikner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
Kristen Surface
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
83%17%<1%
3.88
Kelly Atkins
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Kathy Roan
92W–72L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
Raquel Clark
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amy Curley
14W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Andrea Frick
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Laurie Scott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Kimberly Besser
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%5%95%
3.22
Loretta Zubero
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.