Teams

BC-MCC/MikeYogi

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Tim Crawmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.52
Sejal Penkar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.27
Brent Buchsbaum
published 4.5
4.26
Lauren Estabrook
published
Courtney Black
published 4.5
4.25
Heidi OBrien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Heather Krueger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Bre Kelleher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Rita Benson
published
3.79
Monika Kiznis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Leasa Ireland
published
3.73
Derek Brauch
published 4
3.71
Brian Kelleher
published 4
3.70
Denise Coit
published 4
3.69
Tejs Broberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Craig Benner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Paul Reiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Layla Kiffin
published
3.59
Ivy Charlton
published 4
3.57
Matt Witherell
published
3.44
Michael Stillman
published
3.23
Kathryn Crawmer
published
Julio Davila
published
Mike Yogi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tim Crawmer
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.62
5
Sejal Penkar
50W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.52
4.5
Brent Buchsbaum
2W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Lauren Estabrook
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Courtney Black
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Heidi OBrien
60W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Heather Krueger
23W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Bre Kelleher
67W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
Rita Benson
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Monika Kiznis
101W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Leasa Ireland
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Derek Brauch
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brian Kelleher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Denise Coit
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Tejs Broberg
8W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Craig Benner
37W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Paul Reiner
93W–90L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Layla Kiffin
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Ivy Charlton
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Michael Stillman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kathryn Crawmer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Julio Davila
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Yogi
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.