Teams

Heidi's Team

2021 Springfield Adult 40 & Over League · 4.0 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MISSOURI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-08vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Margaret Taylor vs Kimberly Kilgore / Kathleen Wilson6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJo Sherbo / Threasa Wotkyns vs Karen Talbott / Vickie Adkins6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-24vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Carol Mailes vs Kimberly Kilgore / Tracy Nicholas4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Crouthers / Debbie Cunningham vs Margie Moss / Cathy Faber3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Musick / Christina Waugh vs Laurie Reisch / Gayla Saegert4-6, 3-6
2021-06-17vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJo Sherbo / Patricia Musick vs Vickie Adkins / Cathy Faber7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHee-Sun Kim vs Tiffiny Humbert3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Cunningham / Threasa Wotkyns vs Laurie Reisch / Gayla Saegert3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Mailes / Cheryl Ballou vs Ema Amador / Georgina Bodine6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-10vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesThreasa Wotkyns / Cheryl Ballou vs Misty Compton / Kimberly Kilgore1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Musick vs Tiffiny Humbert4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Clouse / Margaret Taylor vs Cathy Faber / Margie Moss2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJo Sherbo / Julie Skinner vs Tracy Nicholas / Georgina Bodine0-6, 2-6
2021-06-03vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WWon 31
W#1 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Margaret Taylor vs Kimberly Kilgore / Margie Moss4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHee-Sun Kim vs Misty Compton7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebbie Cunningham / Kathy Crouthers vs Vickie Adkins / Karen Talbott6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristina Waugh / Debbie Pell vs Gayla Saegert / Laurie Reisch1-6, 0-6
2021-05-27vs MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Skinner / Debbie Cunningham vs Kimberly Kilgore / Misty Compton3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJo Sherbo / Threasa Wotkyns vs Vickie Adkins / Karen Talbott4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Waugh / Margaret Taylor vs Gayla Saegert / Tiffiny Humbert1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MO/Kilgore/40&Over4.0W5117716159
2Heidi's Team1571737258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Mailes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Christina Waugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Margaret Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.51
Kathy Crouthers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Cheryl Ballou
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Julie Skinner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Debbie Pell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Debbie Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jo Sherbo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Katherine Clouse
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Musick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Threasa Wotkyns
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Clouse + Debbie Pell4157% games+5.3% vs expected
Hee-Sun Kim + Margaret Taylor13656% games+1.2% vs expected
Debbie Cunningham + Kathy Crouthers3450% games−4.6% vs expected
Carol Mailes + Julie Skinner6453% games−4.7% vs expected
Katherine Clouse + Kathy Crouthers5156% games−8.4% vs expected
Julie Skinner + Kathy Crouthers3349% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Musick + Kathy Crouthers4164% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Taylor + Debbie Pell2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Mailes
55W–24L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Christina Waugh
0W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Margaret Taylor
30W–31L career · 8 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kathy Crouthers
32W–32L career · 2 lines in 2021
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Ballou
52W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Julie Skinner
28W–38L career · 2 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Debbie Pell
112W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
Debbie Cunningham
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jo Sherbo
9W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Katherine Clouse
47W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Musick
67W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Threasa Wotkyns
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.