Teams

Elsaadany/Bentonville/Harvest

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 2.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-21vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Chilton / Mark Schmidt vs Alex Ruoff / John Colucci2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAkshay Taneja / Mostafa Elsaadany vs Ruthwik Akula / Joe Gagliardo7-6, 6-3
2026-04-14vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Schmidt / BJ Crouch vs John Colucci / Patrick Chen1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Chilton vs Alex Ruoff6-3, 2-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Mostafa Elsaadany vs Tanner Coleman / Ruthwik Akula2-6, 4-6
2026-04-07vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Schmidt / Michael Chilton vs Tanner Coleman / John Colucci1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAkshay Taneja vs Ruthwik Akula7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBJ Crouch / Mostafa Elsaadany vs Alex Ruoff / Casey Hulliberger3-6, 3-6
2026-03-31vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Mark Schmidt vs Ruthwik Akula / Joe Gagliardo6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Chilton vs Casey Hulliberger6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMostafa Elsaadany / Akshay Taneja vs Alex Ruoff / Tanner Coleman6-2, 6-0
2026-03-17vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Michael Chilton vs Justin Maddox / John Colucci7-5
W#1 SinglesAkshay Taneja vs Tanner Coleman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBJ Crouch / Ryan Sider vs Alex Ruoff / Casey Hulliberger4-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs Coleman/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Mark Schmidt vs Alex Ruoff / Casey Hulliberger7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMostafa Elsaadany vs John Colucci2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAkshay Taneja / BJ Crouch vs Patrick Chen / Don Herr6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Coleman/Rogers/SVCC339917145
2Elsaadany/Bentonville/Harvest339920158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Akshay Taneja
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.51
John Ciulla
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Michael Chilton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.34
BJ Crouch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.97
Mostafa Elsaadany
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Ryan Sider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Akshay Taneja
7W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.65
John Ciulla
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Michael Chilton
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
BJ Crouch
3W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Mostafa Elsaadany
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Ryan Sider
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.