Teams

ATC ROBINSON

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs TCU MILAM/MILNERLost 14
L#1 DoublesShannon Reilly / Meredith Norman vs Caroline Jurgensen / Mary-Alex Thacker2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Blair Manning6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Deda Young vs Kim Milam / Alexandra Festervan2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesWhitley Stout vs Eileen Pekarev6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Donna Reinsch vs Kendra Bowen / Lauren Hollarn0-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs RID RUTTER/KELLERLost 13
W#1 DoublesKathleen Jones / Whitley Stout vs Gina Guirola / Sally Joslin6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristen Pratt vs MEREDITH CODY1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeda Young / Patricia Gouldy vs Joanna Bennett / Jennifer Rutter1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Reilly / Kathy Robinson vs Lindsey Edwards / Maria Isabel Pena-Keller4-6, 5-7
2026-04-03vs WAL LUNNINGHAM/GRADYWon 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Reilly / Diane Mycoskie vs Spring McCurdy / Laura Barnard7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Ashley Mione4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDeda Young / Patricia Gouldy vs Apryl Henrichs / Barbara Chonko6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-31vs TRO MORRILLLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Jones / Diane Mycoskie vs Beth Quinn / Shelby Rogers4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Gouldy / Maia Jourde vs Kat Radeloff / Carrie Davis4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Meghan Riggin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeda Young / Donna Reinsch vs Erica Andrews / Jane Gough1-6, 1-6
2026-03-13vs SOAKS MOORELost 12
W#1 DoublesShannon Reilly / Ashley Spence vs Leticia Martin / Angela Snow6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Angela Uptmore4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Reinsch / Diane Mycoskie vs Eva Gregory / Susan May4-6, 1-6
2026-03-06vs RC BOURGEOISLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Reilly / Whitley Stout vs Rebecca Rucker / Jenna Loeffelholz6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Lindsey Sanders0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Patricia Gouldy vs Tiffany Slataper / Kristin Opitz6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Robinson / Donna Reinsch vs Lindsi Bourgeois / Keri Hickman4-6, 1-6
2026-02-27vs STC PALMER/HEITZWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Mycoskie / Shannon Reilly vs Casey Palmer / Brooke Pazera7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Whitley Stout vs Jessica Gaudin / Tracy Patton6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Andrea Nelson6-1, 6-1
2026-02-20vs BIR GIANCOTTILost 05
L#1 DoublesShannon Reilly / Ashley Spence vs Paige Whitmire / Julie Baugh5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristen Pratt vs Laura Spears6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Reinsch / Diane Mycoskie vs Emily Navarro / Shawna Maginniss4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMeredith Norman vs Kathy Ewen6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaia Jourde / Patricia Gouldy vs Vivian Hoff / Karen Maggi1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Ashley Spence
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Shannon Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.20
Rachel Richter
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
3.17
Diane Mycoskie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Meredith Norman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.13
Kim Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kristen Pratt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.01
Patricia Gouldy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.99
Maia Jourde
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.95
Deda Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Donna Reinsch
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Whitley Stout
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Spence + Shannon Reilly6155% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Spence
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Shannon Reilly
9W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Rachel Richter
20W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Diane Mycoskie
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Meredith Norman
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Kim Simpson
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Kristen Pratt
4W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
Patricia Gouldy
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Maia Jourde
7W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Deda Young
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95
Donna Reinsch
0W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
Whitley Stout
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.