Teams

ETC-Game Point-Petty

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-01vs CAC/SL-ThielWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsi Owoo / Aimee Peck vs Carisa Betancourt / Janice Thiel6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMeghan Brown vs Brenda Havellana6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMindy Ziffren-hall / Nancy Otterholt vs Stephanie Heffner / Becky Matter6-3, 6-0
2026-05-25vs BC-Set Sisters-ForbesWon 21
L#1 DoublesJessica Barrett / Sue Chealander vs Keshia Peters / Angela yang4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJaney Petty vs Alison Young3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Buckley / Aimee Peck vs Na Li / Becca Mahoney2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-18vs BC-RozanskiLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsi Owoo / Christine Shigaki vs Margaret Pak Enslow / Rachel Olson5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMindy Ziffren-hall vs Caitlin Keller7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAimee Peck / Nancy Otterholt vs Cori Durrant / Kara Rozanski3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-11vs NWW-ETC-HsuLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsi Owoo / Christine Shigaki vs Lindsay Little / Lina Hsu5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMindy Ziffren-hall vs Jennifer Eng1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJaney Petty / Jessica Barrett vs Maarit Schroeder / Rachelle Steijn5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-04vs HBSQ-Leiser 2.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Brown / Janey Petty vs Katy Leiser / Tatiana Mehr6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMindy Ziffren-hall vs Rachael Carbary6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIsi Owoo / Christine Shigaki vs Molly Jenkins / Rebecca Brittle6-1, 6-0
2026-04-20vs BAIN-Double the Fun-StillWon 30
W#1 DoublesPranom Leephan-Williams / Christine Shigaki vs Danielle Mariani / Shannon Fitzgerald7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSue Chealander vs Jessica Henderson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Otterholt / Jessica Barrett vs Livia Hernandez / Jessica Jackson6-0, 6-0
2026-04-06vs TCSP-Volley Llamas-BlakeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaney Petty / Meghan Brown vs Laura Blanchard / Amanda Allegre1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMindy Ziffren-hall vs Eriko Eckert6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Shigaki / Isi Owoo vs Maika D'ambrosi / Tamar Blau6-1, 6-4
2026-04-06vs MI-Rowe/Woo-TzengLost 12
W#1 DoublesSue Chealander / Suzanne Selhorn vs Jen Hillberg / Shannon Schell7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAimee Peck vs Viana Messali0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Buckley / Jessica Barrett vs Annie Cudney / Eliza Notaro7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-25vs STC-SchmidtWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Barrett / Janey Petty vs Jennie Oswald / Jennifer Goodrich6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMindy Ziffren-hall vs Anne Wakefield6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Shigaki / Isi Owoo vs Regan Hurley / Kari Larson6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Isi Owoo
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.49
Janey Petty
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.49
Pranom Leephan-Williams
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Nancy Otterholt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Meghan Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Christine Shigaki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.38
Leslie Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Sue Chealander
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Mindy Ziffren-hall
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.22
Jessica Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.08
Aimee Peck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Suzanne Selhorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isi Owoo + Christine Shigaki3260% games+11.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Isi Owoo
12W–13L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Janey Petty
10W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Pranom Leephan-Williams
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Nancy Otterholt
26W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Meghan Brown
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Christine Shigaki
7W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Leslie Buckley
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Sue Chealander
5W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Mindy Ziffren-hall
6W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Jessica Barrett
6W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.22
2.5
Aimee Peck
3W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Suzanne Selhorn
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.