Teams

BIR CHRISTIANSEN

2025 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Men 40 Winter · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-01-25vs RTC WILSON/CIDLost 13
W#1 DoublesDavid Duque / Shiraz Rehman vs Marcelo Elgueta / Jose Prado6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTyler Rogers vs Lon Needham4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Stewart / Gerardo Garmendia vs Allan Wilson / Michael Lewis1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Mollica / Chris Ducanes vs Javier Cid / Kalen Gunderson1-6, 5-7
2025-01-11vs HTC GUASA/IMPERIALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTyler Rogers / Benjamin Bryan vs Andrew Steinbeck / Jonathan MacEda7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTom Christiansen / David Duque vs Pritz Oliver Guasa / Jeorald Pag-Ong3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Tyler Rogers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
David Duque
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Tom Christiansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
John Mollica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Shiraz Rehman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Chris Ducanes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Kartik Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Gerardo Garmendia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kent Swauger
published
Matt Bower
published
Robert Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kartik Kumar + John Mollica1446% games+3.1% vs expected
Tom Christiansen + Shiraz Rehman2348% gamesnot enough data
Tyler Rogers + Shiraz Rehman134 matchesnot enough data
Gerardo Garmendia + Shiraz Rehman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Benjamin Bryan
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Rogers
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
David Duque
8W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Tom Christiansen
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
John Mollica
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.48
Shiraz Rehman
11W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Chris Ducanes
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kartik Kumar
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gerardo Garmendia
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kent Swauger
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Bower
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Fisher
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.