Teams

KY/LEX/Wickline

2025 USTA COMBO LEAGUE 55 & OVER LEXINGTON · 7.5 SENIOR WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 SENIOR WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Laurie Larkin
published
3.69
Leslie Stone
published
3.68
Lisa Grissom
published
3.66
Julia Hollon
published
3.61
Kathryn Whiteman
published
3.58
Ann Boone
published 3.5
3.58
Sandra Wickline
published
3.57
Cindy Bramble
published 4
3.54
Carmen Amato
published 3.5
3.29
Jeannie Guskey
published
3.27
Monica Mullins
published
3.25
Ellen Miller
published
Amy Luchsinger
published 3.5
Brooks Lundy
published 3.5
3.21
Connie Bishop
published 3.5
Vivian Esteve
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Boone + Carmen Amato314 matchesnot enough data
Connie Bishop + Ann Boone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Larkin
45W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Leslie Stone
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Lisa Grissom
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Julia Hollon
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kathryn Whiteman
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Ann Boone
32W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Sandra Wickline
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Cindy Bramble
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Carmen Amato
37W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Jeannie Guskey
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Monica Mullins
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Ellen Miller
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brooks Lundy
1W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Connie Bishop
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Vivian Esteve
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.