Teams

FCC - Khodirev 7.5

2026 Charlottesville Combo · Charlottesville Combo 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-09-02vs ACAC - DeSouzaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJillian Dann / Anne Barger vs Tammy Hertel / Lori Gagnon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarkley Laing / Julie Jones vs Lynne Gibson / Claire Park3-6, 3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Charlottesville Combo 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FL - Furlow000000
2BHSC - Moore - Ball Busters000000
3FCC - Khodirev 7.5000000
4ACAC - DeSouza000000
5BHSC - Hill - Troop BH000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Millie Cathcart
published
3.53
Penny Ward
published
3.37
Coles Warren
published 3.5
3.36
Barkley Laing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Anne Barger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kelley Johnston
published
Sabina Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barkley Laing + Anne Barger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Millie Cathcart
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Penny Ward
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Coles Warren
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Barkley Laing
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Anne Barger
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Kelley Johnston
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sabina Martin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.