Teams

Queens' Court

Non-Advancing Fall Leagues · Women's 2.5 Fall League

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-02-11vs SpinderellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Schwartz / Jennifer Schannault vs Bridget Kimball / Nancy Quinn6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKerri Brennan vs Alicia Bevan6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Glansberg / Marcy Duval vs Janet Franco / Kelly Hite6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-05vs Sportime 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesTheresa OBrien / Imelda Kyne vs Lynn Cabral / Joanne Boniello6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMarcy Duval vs Karen Mahar6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Grasmeder / Lisa Schwartz vs Meagan Mann / Sarah Collins3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-22vs SpinderellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesImelda Kyne / Janine Rome vs Katarzyna Israel / Joslyn Ross7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLisa Schwartz vs Debbie Flaherty6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Glansberg / Tymm Schumaker vs Nancy Quinn / Janet Franco7-5, 6-0
2022-12-18vs SpinderellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanine Rome / Rose Fennessey vs Alexandra George / Kate Roden6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Schwartz vs Rebecca Connard6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Glansberg / Jennifer Schannault vs Bridget Kimball / Joslyn Ross6-4, 6-1
2022-12-04vs Sportime 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJanine Rome / Marcy Duval vs Meagan Mann / Karen Mahar6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarla Vogel vs Sarah Collins1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTheresa OBrien / Tymm Schumaker vs Micheline Ford / Wanda Fischer6-4, 6-1
2022-11-20vs SpinderellasWon 30
W#1 DoublesKerri Brennan / Kathy Grasmeder vs Janet Franco / Kelly Hite6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Schwartz vs Alicia Bevan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesImelda Kyne / Linda Glansberg vs Katarzyna Israel / Rebecca Connard3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-11-13vs Sportime 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Grasmeder / Jennifer Schannault vs Amanda Keller / Laurie Tyler6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLisa Schwartz vs Marcia Mitchell6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTymm Schumaker / Janine Rome vs Patrice Rogers / Joanne Boniello6-1, 6-1
2022-10-30vs SpinderellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesImelda Kyne / Lisa Schwartz vs Katarzyna Israel / Debbie Flaherty7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKerri Brennan vs Alicia Bevan6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTheresa OBrien / Rose Fennessey vs Kate Roden / Janet Franco1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-23vs Sportime 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJanine Rome / Theresa OBrien vs Karen Mahar / Laurie Tyler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarla Vogel vs Micheline Ford6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathy Grasmeder / Linda Glansberg vs Patrice Rogers / Wanda Fischer6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 2.5 Fall League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Imelda Kyne
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Schwartz
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.91
Kathy Grasmeder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Theresa OBrien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Janine Rome
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kerri Brennan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Tymm Schumaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Linda Glansberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Jennifer Schannault
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Marla Vogel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Marcy Duval
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rose Fennessey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Rome + Imelda Kyne5074% games+14.0% vs expected
Kathy Grasmeder + Kerri Brennan5259% games+8.6% vs expected
Kathy Grasmeder + Lisa Schwartz5254% games+7.4% vs expected
Linda Glansberg + Tymm Schumaker3353% games+6.5% vs expected
Theresa OBrien + Imelda Kyne2355% games+2.8% vs expected
Theresa OBrien + Janine Rome13660% games+2.2% vs expected
Theresa OBrien + Rose Fennessey3549% games+1.8% vs expected
Kathy Grasmeder + Rose Fennessey134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Imelda Kyne
53W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Lisa Schwartz
35W–18L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathy Grasmeder
31W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Theresa OBrien
47W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Janine Rome
42W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Kerri Brennan
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Tymm Schumaker
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Linda Glansberg
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
2.57
Jennifer Schannault
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.48
Marla Vogel
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28
Marcy Duval
23W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rose Fennessey
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.