Teams

RTC DURBORAW

2024 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

24 players · average NTRP 3.22 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Diamira Avila
published 4
3.31
3.25
Julia Fitsimones
published
3.25
Catherine Whitaker
published 3.5
3.18
Maura Jackson
published
3.18
Maura Jackson
published
3.15
Michelle Barron
published
3.07
Lorein Campbell
published
3.00
Alicia Norwood
published 3
2.95
Cindy Trammell
published 3
2.95
Cindy Trammell
published 3
2.93
Ildiko Lingvay
published
2.89
Nanette Commerford
published
2.87
Kolleen Kiburz
published
2.86
Deanna Sullivan
published 3
2.77
Beth Haugh
published 3
2.75
JULIE PARKE
published
2.73
Sam Martinez
published
2.71
Linda Blair
published
2.63
MaryAnne Criswell
published
2.60
Dee Dee Stewart
published 3
2.57
Keri Vaughn
published
2.50
Katrina Wagner
published
2.40
Koree Buoni
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JULIE PARKE + Linda Blair4450% games+3.9% vs expected
Cindy Trammell + JULIE PARKE4743% games−2.9% vs expected
Katrina Wagner + Linda Blair134 matchesnot enough data
JULIE PARKE + Beth Haugh224 matchesnot enough data
Katrina Wagner + JULIE PARKE123 matchesnot enough data
Deanna Sullivan + MaryAnne Criswell123 matchesnot enough data
JULIE PARKE + Sam Martinez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diamira Avila
35W–25L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Carley Amyx-Marsteller
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Julia Fitsimones
24W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Catherine Whitaker
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Maura Jackson
20W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Maura Jackson
20W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%10%90%
3.18
Michelle Barron
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Lorein Campbell
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Alicia Norwood
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Cindy Trammell
32W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Cindy Trammell
32W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Ildiko Lingvay
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Nanette Commerford
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.89
Kolleen Kiburz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Deanna Sullivan
27W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Beth Haugh
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
JULIE PARKE
28W–30L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
Sam Martinez
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Linda Blair
18W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
MaryAnne Criswell
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Dee Dee Stewart
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.60
Keri Vaughn
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
Katrina Wagner
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Koree Buoni
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.