Teams

Martin/Lee

2024 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Hewitt / Jonathan Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-31vs SWW-VicenteLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Martin / Stephen Hewitt vs Blake Stockstad / Oliver Vicente3-6, 1-6
2024-03-22vs Huang-McDoubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Lee / Justin Martin vs Benton Huang / Carlo Itchon6-7, 2-6
2024-03-17vs Kradjan-One Doubles 2024Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Martin / Jin Park vs Christopher Kradjan / Nathan Dudley6-4, 7-5
2024-03-08vs SWW-VicenteLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Hewitt / Jonathan Lee vs Oliver Vicente / Blake Stockstad3-6, 2-6
2024-03-01vs Teel-TENOBALost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Hewitt / Jonathan Lee vs Tauseef Badar / Stu Teel3-6, 1-6
2024-02-23vs Huang-McDoubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Martin / Stephen Hewitt vs Benton Huang / Carlo Itchon0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Vicente7171341
2Huang-McDouble5353766
3Kradjan-One Doubles 20244444971
4Teel-TENOBA4444976
5Martin/Lee35351076
6Team Kajal17171483

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Justin Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.72
Stephen Hewitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jin Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Martin + Stephen Hewitt0530% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Justin Martin
43W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Stephen Hewitt
103W–137L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.72
Jin Park
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.