Teams

MTC McElgunn

2022 Richmond Mixed 55 & Over · Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-15vs ACAC StephensLost 02
L#1 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Susan Zielinski vs Jeffrey Johnson / Jeanette Kim3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSean McElgunn / Peggy McElgunn vs Tracy Marks / Diane Linderman1-6, 1-6
2022-08-11vs Willow Oaks KellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Sander / Susan Zielinski vs Meda Lane / Kim Boys6-2, 6-3
2022-08-09vs Avalon MizrachSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Barry George / Kim Schultz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeggy McElgunn / Sean McElgunn vs Glenn Mizrach / Renita Randolph2-6, 3-6
2022-07-14vs Avalon MihalkoLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Leon Cella vs Rebecca Morgan / Richard Bland1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Cutlip / Pamela Stidham vs Betsy Siewers / Brad Williamson0-6, 3-6
2022-07-07vs Willow Oaks KellyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDoug Cook / Susan Zielinski vs Terence Blackwood / Sandy Pisano6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLewis Farinholt / Pamela Stidham vs Richard Kelly / Meda Lane7-6, 7-6
2022-06-30vs ACAC StephensLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeggy McElgunn / William Cutlip vs Joseph Cipolla / Dawn MacHonis0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Griffin / Susan Zielinski vs Joanne Wilson / Scott McFadden1-6, 3-6
2022-06-16vs Avalon MizrachWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Stidham / Michael Sander vs Kim Schultz / Barry George7-6, 6-4
2022-06-09vs Avalon MihalkoLost 03
L#1 DoublesPamela Stidham / Leon Cella vs Nancy Mihalko / William Bryan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Zielinski / Lewis Farinholt vs Sheri Carlyle / Gabriel Ghita1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy McElgunn / Sean McElgunn vs Alice Ulrichs / Tom Foster1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Pamela Stidham
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Peggy McElgunn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Doug Cook
published 3.5
3.18
Carol Beth Cook
published 3.5
3.12
Robin Meyer
published
3.09
Susan Zielinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
William Cutlip
published
Lewis Farinholt
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pamela Stidham
62W–94L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Peggy McElgunn
144W–170L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Doug Cook
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carol Beth Cook
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Robin Meyer
15W–23L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Susan Zielinski
125W–157L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
William Cutlip
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
Lewis Farinholt
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.