Teams

Henderson 4.0 40+ Fall

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-24vs Sargent 4-OhhLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Vanderploeg / Wesley Swoopes vs James Steele / Craig Satterfeal1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Weaver / Charles Abney vs Nelson Bond / Ben Edwards7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoseph Marks / Philip Parker vs John Smith / Andrew Plankenhorn2-6, 1-6
2024-11-07vs Sargent 4-OhhLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Vanderploeg / Joseph Marks vs John Smith / Jay Mandal6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Weaver / Jeremy Pope vs Ross Sargent / Mark Sommers0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Parker / Gary Stephens vs Carl Laitinen / Andrew Plankenhorn3-6, 4-6
2024-10-30vs Sargent 4-OhhLost 13
L#1 DoublesWesley Swoopes / Michael Vanderploeg vs James Steele / Craig Satterfeal6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBen Martin vs Andrew Tichow2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Weaver / DANIEL FRITH vs Nelson Bond / Ben Edwards6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBryan Henderson / Patton Watson vs Akram Haggag / Alejandro Vasquez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-15vs GilliesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeremy Pope / Charles Abney vs John Worley / Arthur Wang6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeff Tate / Wesley Swoopes vs Christopher Chapman / Katsuak Sasaki6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonathan Pope / Gary Stephens vs Brian Lee / Charles Brinkley6-0, 6-2
2024-10-01vs GilliesWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharles Abney / Michael Vanderploeg vs Brian Lee / Chad Caldwell6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBen Martin vs NADESH RAMROOP3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeremy Pope / Wesley Swoopes vs Christopher Chapman / Craig Hovan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNeil Matson / DANIEL FRITH vs John Worley / Yeong Seon Kim6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Michael Vanderploeg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
DANIEL FRITH
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Patton Watson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Chris Beatty
published 4
3.58
Charles Abney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Neil Matson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.50
Wesley Swoopes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Ben Martin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Joseph Marks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Gary Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Jeremy Pope
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.37
Jeff Tate
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Bryan Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Philip Parker
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryan Henderson + Gary Stephens4164% games+7.1% vs expected
Michael Vanderploeg + Charles Abney3249% gamesnot enough data
Wesley Swoopes + Michael Vanderploeg134 matchesnot enough data
Philip Parker + Neil Matson314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Parker + Gary Stephens123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Vanderploeg + Neil Matson213 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Tate + Gary Stephens213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Beatty + Gary Stephens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Vanderploeg
50W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
DANIEL FRITH
56W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Patton Watson
60W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Chris Beatty
20W–27L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Charles Abney
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Neil Matson
93W–56L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
Wesley Swoopes
47W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
3.5
Ben Martin
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Joseph Marks
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Gary Stephens
47W–37L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Jeremy Pope
65W–39L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jeff Tate
24W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Bryan Henderson
27W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Philip Parker
25W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.