Teams

MEMPK ABELLO

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-25vs FLYHS HICKERSONLost 12
L#1 DoublesGregory Smith / David Evans vs Jason Hickerson / John Swenson4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGreg Schochet vs Anthony Park4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPhil Abello / Arthur Bachet vs Michael Clawson / Mark Schmucker6-2, 7-6
2026-08-18vs CSRC MEDINAWon 21
L#1 DoublesNoah Muayad / David Evans vs Nate Hopkins / William Stone2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGreg Schochet vs Brad Stark6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGregory Smith / Phil Abello vs Matthew Ehrlin / James Robers6-1, 6-0
2026-08-11vs CCW MCCLELLANDWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Noah Muayad vs Eric Scott / Troy Kittelson6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Bird vs Tom Jackson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesArthur Bachet / Gregory Smith vs Harsha Nagaraj / William Tostanoski6-2, 6-3
2026-07-28vs CSRC BARKERWon 21
W#1 DoublesGregory Smith / Arthur Bachet vs Zach Barker / David Palazzo6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNoah Muayad vs Radu Petrescu2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGreg Schochet / David Bird vs Paul Hurcomb / Jason Gonzales7-5, 6-2
2026-07-21vs FLYHS HICKERSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Evans / Noah Muayad vs John Swenson / Anthony Park6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Bird vs Jason Hickerson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesArthur Bachet / Phil Abello vs Michael Clawson / Peter Viliesis6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Arthur Bachet
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
Gregory Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Noah Muayad
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.19
Phil Abello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Greg Schochet
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
David Bird
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Hugo Fontalvo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Smith + Greg Schochet5356% games+2.1% vs expected
Gregory Smith + Phil Abello4259% gamesnot enough data
Arthur Bachet + Phil Abello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Arthur Bachet
43W–23L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Gregory Smith
79W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Noah Muayad
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Phil Abello
37W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Greg Schochet
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
David Bird
4W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Hugo Fontalvo
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.