Teams

Lu/Richards

2025 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 6.0 W 55&Over

8 players · average NTRP / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-11vs Everett/WilkerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDionne Richards / Pam Kroh vs Patty Avilez / Linda Wilker2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bunting / Susmita Sura vs Michele van Vark / Karen Braud1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-07vs IA/Baddeloo/Mullin/55&Over6.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Kroh / Dionne Richards vs Mary Everett / Michelle Mullin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTerri Bunting / Penee Indelicato vs Gaylyn Markowski / Cheryl Minor0-6, 4-6
2025-03-02vs IA/Baddeloo/Mullin/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTerri Bunting / Penee Indelicato vs Pamela Billerbeck / Cheryl Minor1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDionne Richards / Pam Kroh vs Kristin Rose / Barbara Sedgley6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-21vs Everett/WilkerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPenee Indelicato / Terri Bunting vs Michele van Vark / Jill Liebe4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDionne Richards / Susmita Sura vs Deborah Fleagle / Susan Christensen6-2, 6-3
2025-01-12vs IA/Baddeloo/Mullin/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathleen Lu / Penee Indelicato vs Janice Koder / Pamela Billerbeck3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bunting / Susmita Sura vs Barbara Sedgley / Kristin Rose3-6, 4-6
2024-11-01vs Everett/WilkerWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Cobb / Terri Bunting vs Karen Braud / Christa Whitmer0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Lu / Penee Indelicato vs Michele van Vark / Susan Christensen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPam Kroh / Susmita Sura vs Salisha Jones / Deborah Fleagle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 W 55&Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Baddeloo/Mullin/55&Over6.0W4211717130
2Everett/Wilker339919135
3Lu/Richards2471127184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Nancy Cobb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Pam Bangtson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.75
Dionne Richards
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.65
Terri Bunting
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Kathleen Lu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Pam Kroh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Susmita Sura
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Penee Indelicato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susmita Sura + Terri Bunting2351% games+5.2% vs expected
Dionne Richards + Pam Kroh6451% games+3.7% vs expected
Susmita Sura + Pam Kroh4450% games−6.9% vs expected
Kathleen Lu + Dionne Richards1539% games−19.1% vs expected
Susmita Sura + Kathleen Lu0641% gamesnot enough data
Susmita Sura + Dionne Richards2350% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Cobb + Dionne Richards4160% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Lu + Pam Kroh2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Cobb
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Pam Bangtson
35W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Dionne Richards
53W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Terri Bunting
11W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.65
Kathleen Lu
21W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Pam Kroh
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Susmita Sura
24W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Penee Indelicato
5W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.