Teams

Indy A18 3.0W IRCD Carlson

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Women, S

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-14vs Indy A18 3.0W TBC LoveysWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Groswald Hess / Claire Hunter vs Tarpey O'Rourke / Lindsey Salisbury2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Calvert vs Taylor Hahn6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTomo Shimano / Whitney Bogus vs Natalie Roy / Jerianna Kelly6-2, 3-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Wang vs Ruth Goelz2-6, 5-7
2026-06-23vs Indy A18 3.0W CRC WilliamsWon 21
W#1 SinglesKatie Katris vs Michelle Williams6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Groswald Hess vs Jo Biggers6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLily Pai / Julianna Fitzgerald vs Stacie Courtney / Mary Hudgens3-6, 6-7
2026-06-16Won 30
W#1 SinglesStephanie Wang vs Hannah Helfert6-4, 3-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Calvert / Amy Groswald Hess vs Mary Konkle / Kristyn Robe6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Mulcahy / Julianna Fitzgerald vs Lindsay Meadows / Natalie Swallow6-1, 6-2
2026-05-26vs Indy A18 3.0W RP FritzWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Henderzahs / Tomo Shimano vs Courtney Reinkemeyer / Katie Geik5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJulie Calvert vs Kaitlin Duran6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLily Pai / Linda Mulcahy vs Cara Roellgen / Allison Sparks6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CIN Indy 18 & Over 3.0 Women, S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Katie Katris
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Lily Pai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Julie Calvert
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Lierin Melvin
published
2.77
Amy Groswald Hess
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Andrea Turner
published 3
Ashley Welch
published 3
2.60
Julianna Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Stephanie Wang
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.52
Heather Karazim
published 3
2.52
Tomo Shimano
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 44% · published
Linda Mulcahy
published
Morgan Polizzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Polizzi + Katie Katris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Katris
22W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lily Pai
52W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Julie Calvert
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Lierin Melvin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Groswald Hess
23W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Andrea Turner
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Ashley Welch
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Julianna Fitzgerald
10W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Stephanie Wang
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.57
3
Heather Karazim
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Tomo Shimano
21W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Linda Mulcahy
24W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Morgan Polizzi
11W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.