Teams

WO-Moehling

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Jeff Moehling vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-12vs WW-RacelisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Moehling / Kristen Hager vs SanDee Gammon / Yancey Jones3-6, 2-6
2023-03-11vs SAL-LaneLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Jeff Moehling vs Kyle Fondren / Emily Hartman7-6, 2-5
2023-02-11vs ACAC-HatcherWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Hager / Thomas Burke vs Charmaine Nerone / Ken Hatcher6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Jeff Moehling vs Kandyce Baker / John Carlton6-4, 6-2
2023-01-29vs MAC-WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoland Vetter / Kristen Hager vs Zach Pettit / Kaitlyn Mejia6-7, 1-6
2023-01-22vs ACAC-WilsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Hager / James Rosenstock vs Jeffrey Foddrell / Sandra Holahan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Jeff Moehling vs Matt Pepple / Joanne Wilson6-7, 3-0
2023-01-08vs BURK-ColginLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Jeff Moehling vs Kasey Booth / Sam McKelvey4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Darlene Moehling
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.56
Kristen Hager
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
James Rosenstock
published
3.42
Heather Drew
published
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.33
Roland Vetter
published
3.31
Scott Boyle
published
3.24
Jeff Moehling
published
3.20
Elizabeth Garnett
published
3.18
John Port
published
3.13
Jenefer Williams
published
3.12
Brian Ford
published 3.5
Liz Benedetti
published
Squig Moore
published
Thomas Burke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Roland Vetter404 matchesnot enough data
John Port + Elizabeth Garnett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
110W–77L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Kristen Hager
44W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
James Rosenstock
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
Heather Drew
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Roland Vetter
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Scott Boyle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Jeff Moehling
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Elizabeth Garnett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
John Port
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jenefer Williams
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Liz Benedetti
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Squig Moore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Burke
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.