Teams

A55 6.0M PW Longoria

2023 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-20vs OH NEO A55 6.0M BassakLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Lancaster / Ronald Longoria vs Tom Pozza / Mike Devine0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Barker / Gary Montgomery vs Mark Caldwell / James Taylor7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDoug Young / John Shami vs Jeff Belton / Ronald Bassak4-6, 1-6
2023-06-29vs A55 6.0M TP2 FoxSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Barker / Gary Montgomery vs Brian Lambright / Randall Fairfax3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Shami / Richard Lancaster vs Brian Moore / Ron Novak7-5, 6-3
2023-06-22vs A55 6.0M NR CortsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Ziska / Ronald Longoria vs Robert Rosenau / James Wang1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Barker / Gary Montgomery vs Steven Pauwels / Michael Boukzam0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Shami / Richard Lancaster vs Craig Warner / Duane Sycz1-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs A55 6.0M AO MacfarlaneWon 20
W#1 DoublesGary Montgomery / Robert Barker vs Fernando Bertero / Ted MacFarlane6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Shami / Richard Lancaster vs John Finucane / Rick Baker6-3, 6-3
2023-06-08vs OH NEO A55 6.0M BassakLost 03
L#1 DoublesGary Montgomery / Robert Barker vs Mike Devine / Vince Cheverine5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Lancaster / John Shami vs Patrick Renz / Jeff Belton1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Bennhoff / Brian McKendry vs James Schulte / James Taylor2-6, 5-7
2023-05-25vs A55 6.0M TP2 FoxWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Barker / Gary Montgomery vs William Fox / Harvey Krieger7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Shami / Richard Lancaster vs Rich Herbruck / John Guran6-4, 6-3
2023-05-18vs A55 6.0M NR CortsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDoug Young / John Ziska vs Robert Corts / James Wang0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGary Montgomery / Robert Barker vs Jeffry Armbruster / William Farr6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSteve Hoelzer / David Bennhoff vs Lars Traner / Bernard Andrews7-5, 6-2
2023-05-11vs A55 6.0M AO MacfarlaneLost 12
W#1 DoublesRichard Lancaster / John Shami vs Paul Sutor / Michael Elliott6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Campanella / Robert Barker vs Fernando Bertero / Ted MacFarlane0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Hoelzer / David Bennhoff vs Rick Baker / John Finucane6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH NEO A55 6.0M Bassak7116818164
2A55 6.0M NR Corts6218614148
3A55 6.0M PW Longoria44121225218
4A55 6.0M AO Macfarlane2681636239
5A55 6.0M TP2 Fox1761837259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Steve Hoelzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Gary Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Brian McKendry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Bennhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
John Shami
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
John Ziska
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Robert Barker
published
Ronald Longoria
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Campanella
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Hoelzer + Richard Lancaster9356% gamesnot enough data
Richard Lancaster + Ronald Longoria01123% gamesnot enough data
John Shami + Richard Lancaster5548% gamesnot enough data
David Bennhoff + Steve Hoelzer123 matchesnot enough data
Gary Montgomery + Richard Lancaster033 matchesnot enough data
Ronald Longoria + John Ziska033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Hoelzer
25W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Gary Montgomery
20W–40L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Brian McKendry
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
2.5
David Bennhoff
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Shami
15W–24L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Ziska
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Lancaster
27W–32L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Barker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Longoria
12W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Campanella
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.