Teams

Lob Marley and the Whalers

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-06-02vs Mas Serve Aces (MSA)Won 21
L#1 DoublesChad Trued / Bob Haycock vs Douglas Salerno / Richard Bermensolo4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Boren / Jeffrey Raulston vs Kevin Maloney / Thomas Maloney6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBen Meibergen vs Scott Henson6-3, 6-4
2021-05-25vs Grip N RipLost 02
L#2 DoublesBen Meibergen / Luke Felt vs Rajan Patel / Anil Kukutla3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCasey Boren / Micah Vogt vs Shyam Anantharaman / Gopal Dhingra2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Spencer Woods
published 4.5
3.96
Tayler Henrie
published 4
3.81
Alex Henrie
published 4
3.71
Chad Trued
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Bob Haycock
published 3.5
3.55
Ben Meibergen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Micah Vogt
published 3.5
3.36
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
3.27
Luke Felt
published 3.5
Casey Boren
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Raulston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Taylor Lucius
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Felt + Bob Haycock5455% games+9.7% vs expected
Chad Trued + Bob Haycock231455% games−1.6% vs expected
Casey Boren + Anthony Saulino14655% gamesnot enough data
Casey Boren + Bob Haycock8648% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Raulston + Bob Haycock4950% gamesnot enough data
Ben Meibergen + Luke Felt8459% gamesnot enough data
Casey Boren + Luke Felt2643% gamesnot enough data
Luke Felt + Jeffrey Raulston6257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Spencer Woods
152W–73L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Tayler Henrie
120W–68L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Alex Henrie
75W–25L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Chad Trued
67W–77L career · 1 line in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Bob Haycock
145W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Ben Meibergen
104W–52L career · 2 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Micah Vogt
78W–61L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Anthony Saulino
113W–63L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Luke Felt
101W–105L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Casey Boren
84W–99L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeffrey Raulston
52W–45L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Taylor Lucius
19W–24L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.